PHL 700R DAY 2 Constructing Meaning From Multiple Sources
PHL 700R DAY 2 Constructing Meaning
From Multiple Sources
PHL 700R DAY
2 Constructing Meaning From Multiple Sources
PHL 700R DAY 2 Constructing Meaning From Multiple Sources
PHL 700R DAY 2 Constructing Meaning From
Multiple Sources
Constructing Meaning from
Multiple Sources
Read two higher
education-specific articles located in this week’s Electronic Reserve
Readings.Conduct a close rereading of each article.
Complete the following worksheet.
Student name:
Part I
|
Elements for Comparison and Contrast
|
Payne & Gainey Text
|
Tsui Text
|
||
|
Description in your own words
|
Evidence from the text
(Include direct quotes and page numbers)
|
Description in your own words
|
Evidence from the text
(Include direct quotes and page numbers)
|
|
|
Explicit Meaning
|
||||
|
Implicit Meaning
|
||||
|
My situatedness with respect to the texts
|
||||
Part II
Based on your close reading and
the information in your worksheet, write 1–2 paragraphs in which you synthesize
the scholarly discourse about critical thinking in higher education. Beyond
summarizing the articles individually, critically assess the similarities and
differences between the authors’ perspectives and approaches, essentially
reviewing the texts as in dialogue with one another. For example, your
comparison might complete the following:
- Describe philosophical and ideological tensions between the
articles.
- Describe logical or historicized foundations common to both
articles.
- Describe writing practices the articles share and the
potential rationale for those practices.
Submit the assignment prior to
the beginning of the Day Three Workshop and bring a copy with you on Day Three
for an in-class activity.
V120717
PHL 700R DAY 2 Constructing
Meaning From Multiple Sources
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий